APFT or ACFT: Which Test Best Reflects Combat Readiness?

[theodorep1]

Hi everyone,

I’ve been thinking a lot about the transition from the APFT to the ACFT in the Army. The ACFT seems more holistic, focusing on functional fitness and combat readiness, but I’ve heard mixed reviews. Some say it’s a better measure of overall fitness, while others argue it’s harder to implement and creates challenges, especially for soldiers in remote areas without access to proper equipment.

What do you think? Has the ACFT been a positive change, or do you feel the APFT was sufficient? How has the transition affected your fitness routine or unit cohesion? And for leaders, how do you manage training for such diverse fitness standards?

[Lucaste]

The ACFT offers a broader assessment of fitness and combat readiness, focusing on functional strength and endurance compared to the APFT’s simplicity. While many appreciate its relevance to real-world tasks, others find challenges in accessing the required equipment, especially in remote areas. Some also believe the ACFT’s complexity may disadvantage certain soldiers. I’ve read complete article on APFT vs. ACFT and it helped me a lot to understand all this. What’s your experience with the transition? Do you think the ACFT is worth the investment, or was the APFT sufficient for measuring soldier fitness?

[Author]

Posts